Intervues
◆ Structured · integrity-enforced · audit-readyFor in-house teams, agencies & placement cells

From 2 August, your AI interviewer
is a high-risk system. Ours was built like one.

Every score cited · one room for everyone.

AI used in recruitment is named explicitly as high-riskunder the EU AI Act's Annex III — impact assessments, human oversight, candidate notice, and logging, all binding from 2 August 2026. We built for that bar from day one: every score cited to a timestamp and a quote, and consent before the microphone ever opens.

See a sample fit report

·A real reply from the founder, not a sales team   ·Candidate consent & data handling built in   · Bias-resistant by design

SCREEN · SDE-2 BACKEND · ROLE #4471  ·  200 candidates · structured · identical12 interviewer-hours saved
Candidate · 0188Postgres · queues · API design
8.4
shortlist
Candidate · 0142Strong system design, thin on testing
7.1
shortlist
Candidate · 0203Good fundamentals, coverage gaps
5.6
review
Candidate · 0117Role-ask mismatch on scale
4.2
hold
Why 0188 scored 8.4 — every claim cited
“Partitioned by tenant_id; moved FK integrity to the app layer with a reconciliation job.”↳ 00:31:18 · verified against live editor run
Coverage17 / 18 topics
Integrityclean · presence verified
Fit to role-asks9 / 10
~45 min saved per candidate0 scheduling no-shows1 identical bar for everyone
What just became binding

The compliance deadline that makes this a buy-or-build decision.

Aug 2

EU AI Act, Annex III

Recruitment AI is named explicitly as high-risk. From 2 August 2026: fundamental-rights impact assessments, human oversight, candidate notice, technical documentation, logging, and post-market monitoring — or penalties up to €35M or 7% of global turnover.

Annual

NYC Local Law 144

Independent bias audits, published publicly, at least once a year — and it applies extraterritorially to any employer evaluating a candidate who resides in NYC, wherever the role or the company sits.

Feb 2026

Colorado AI Act

One more state with its own hiring-AI disclosure and impact-assessment regime already in force — the pattern isn't slowing down, it's compounding.

Accent calibration is a compliance control, not a feature.

Generic AI screeners run a 30–50% word-error rate on Indian-accented English versus 2–8% on native speakers — a measurable, auditable disparate-impact vector, not a rounding error. Under an EU AI Act impact assessment or a Local Law 144 bias audit, that gap is exactly the kind of finding that ends a vendor relationship.

Named, versioned control. A documented 1.25× pause-tolerance multiplier, not an undisclosed heuristic.
Scores reflect what was said, not how it was accented — the exact axis regulators are asking about.
Auditable by design.The calibration parameters and score distributions an auditor needs already exist — we don't have to build them for the audit.
What screening costs you today

The first round is where good hiring quietly breaks.

~45min

Per candidate, per screen

Your senior engineers spend it on first-round phone screens that a structured interviewer could run identically — and they're inconsistent every time anyway.

38.5%

Remote-interview cheating

Across a 19,368-interview dataset. Copilots feed candidates answers your panel can't see. You need integrity that's verifiable, not vibes.

30–50%

Accent error in other tools

Generic AI screeners mis-transcribe Indian-accented English and quietly penalise it. That's not a fit signal — that's bias you can be audited for.

How it runs at scale

Roster to shortlist, without the hours.

01

Bring the role

Give us the JD — or your own question bank. We build the role blueprint: 15–20 weighted, time-budgeted topics. Roster/CSV intake for bulk pilots is on the roadmap.

02

Everyone sits the same room

Each candidate gets the identical structured voice interview, on their own time. No scheduling, no no-shows, one bar for all.

03

Scored against the role

Every score is cited to a timestamp, a quote, a code run, a diagram element. Integrity checks run quietly in the background.

04

Fit reports, ready to hand off

One fit report per candidate — score, evidence, and role-fit mapped to your role-asks. Direct ATS push (Greenhouse, Lever) is on the roadmap.

What teams get that candidates don't

Built for evaluation, not just practice.

consistency

One identical interview, every candidate

Structured assessment mode runs the same blueprint, the same topics, the same bar for everyone — so you're comparing candidates, not interviewer moods.

Defensible · the same room for all
integrity

Hard to fool, by construction

Full-session memory and contradiction detection — not a proctoring layer. The interviewer remembers what a candidate said forty minutes ago and follows up if it stops adding up. Presence/integrity checks are on the roadmap, not live yet.

Consent-first · no covert capture
scoring

Every score cites its evidence

No “the AI thinks they're a 7.” Each rating links to the exact timestamp, quote, code run, or diagram it came from — an auditor can trace every point back to the room.

Auditable · no black box
fairness

Indian-English calibrated

The accent handling that protects candidates is also what protects you: scores reflect what was said, not how it was accented — reducing a bias other tools bake in.

Bias-resistant · audit-ready
your pipeline

Fit reports, and a talent pool that compounds

Every candidate gets a fit report mapped to your role-asks. Over time, every candidate who's demonstrated a role becomes part of a verified pool you can hire from directly — screening you only have to do once. Bulk CSV intake and direct ATS push are on the roadmap.

Per-candidate reportfit, not transcript
ATS pushroadmap
Custom question banksupload your own
Verified talent poolhire pre-screened
The honest math

What structured screening gives back.

Your numbers, not ours. We only assume the ~45 min/screen your own seniors spend today.

150
interviewer-hours returned every month

$4.5K
in senior time, back on real work each month

Same bar for every candidate, evidence behind every score, and your engineers out of the phone-screen treadmill.

Who runs Intervues this way

Three teams, one structured room.

in-house

Recruiting teams

Run a consistent first round at volume, free your engineers from phone screens, and hand hiring managers a ranked, evidence-cited shortlist.

agencies

Staffing & IT agencies

Screen a large bench fast and submit candidates with a defensible fit report attached — proof of quality your clients can trust, not just a CV.

campus

Bootcamps & placement cells

Give every student a real, structured mock under one bar, show placement partners verified readiness, and route the strongest into the talent pool.

Integrity you can stand behind in an audit.

Proctoring done badly punishes nervous, neurodivergent, or differently-accented candidates. We treat integrity as a private signal for your team, with the limits stated up front — not a verdict stamped on a person.

Consent-first.Candidates are told what's monitored before they begin. No covert capture.
Memory over monitoring. Full-session recall and contradiction detection do the integrity work today — presence/proctoring checks are roadmap, not a number we quote before shipping them.
Signals stay private.When integrity checks ship, flags go to your team for review, never onto the candidate's record as a public judgement.
Accent ≠ guilt. Calibration prevents Indian-English from being read as evasion — the bias other tools quietly encode.
Compliance-ready. Data handling and biometric-consent requirements built in for the regions you hire in.
Team pricing

A prepaid credit pool, sized to your hiring.

Same honest mechanic — one credit, one full structured interview and fit report — bought as a monthly pool your team draws from. No per-seat tax, no shelfware.

Team pool
From $4 / screen
Prepaid monthly pool · volume-rated
  • Structured interview + fit report per candidate
  • ATS push (roadmap — export today)
  • Custom question banks & role blueprints
  • Shared dashboard & ranked shortlists
Agencies & campuses
Volume & bench
Let's talk
Built around your bench size & cadence
  • Everything in Team pool
  • High-volume bench screening rates
  • Submission-ready fit reports for clients
  • Verified talent-pool access
  • Integrity & compliance configuration
Single seat
Free · 1 screen
Run one real screen before you commit
  • One structured interview, on us
  • A full, real fit report to judge quality
  • See the evidence-cited scoring yourself

Illustrative pricing · set your own. Pilots are scoped to one role so you can judge the fit reports on real candidates.

For hiring teams

What you'll want to know before a pilot.

How do you stop candidates from cheating? +
The interview itself is built to be hard to fool — full-session memory, contradiction detection, and follow-ups that probe whether an answer is really theirs. Presence/integrity checks for high-stakes screens are on the roadmap; we'll tell you plainly when they ship rather than claim it early.
Will the candidate experience reflect badly on us? +
It's the opposite of a cold form. Candidates get a patient interviewer that waits, hears their accent properly, and doesn't cut them off — and they can practise in preparation mode beforehand. A structured, respectful screen is a better first impression of your company than an inconsistent phone screen.
How does it fit our ATS and workflow? +
Today: a candidate roster and JD in, a fit report per candidate out — mapped to your role-asks, with a score and the evidence behind it, ready to drop into whatever you already use. Direct ATS push (Greenhouse, Lever) is on the roadmap; a pilot doesn't need it to prove the scoring is worth trusting.
Can we trust the scores? +
Every score is cited to a timestamp, a quote, a code run, or a diagram element — no black box. Formal calibration against your own interviewers is part of every pilot, not a number we quote before running one. Because the bar is identical for every candidate, you're comparing people fairly rather than comparing interviewer moods.
What about data, consent and compliance? +
Candidates are told what's monitored before they start — no covert capture. Recordings and integrity signals are handled per the biometric-consent and data rules of the regions you hire in, integrity flags stay private to your team, and candidates retain rights over their own session data.
Are you an EU AI Act high-risk provider or deployer, and what do you supply? +
Recruitment AI is named explicitly under Annex III of the EU AI Act, with high-risk obligations binding from 2 August 2026. We supply the technical documentation, logging, and human-oversight hooks a deployer needs for their own fundamental-rights impact assessment — every score cited to a timestamp and a quote, candidates told what's monitored before they start.
Can you produce documentation for a Local Law 144 bias audit? +
Yes. Because every score already carries its evidence and our Indian-English calibration is a named, versioned control rather than a black box, the underlying data an independent auditor needs — score distributions and calibration parameters — already exists. We'll work directly with your auditor.
What's your data residency? +
Interview recordings, transcripts, and reports are stored in the region you hire in, handled per that region's biometric-consent and data rules. We don't sell candidate data, share it across customers, or train other models on it.

Run one role. Judge the fit reports.

A pilot is scoped to a single role on real candidates — so the decision is the work, not the pitch. CSV in, shortlist out.

See a sample fit report

· Scoped to one role   ·Consent & compliance built in   · A real reply from the founder