2 × Backend (Go / Distributed)
Client: Global Fintech · 6-month initial SOW · High-throughput transaction settlement engine.
Skills to evidenceDelivery managers, tech leads and founders post a concrete need brief. You get candidates with verified evidence of the actual work: shipped projects, mentor-merged PRs, objective skills graphs, and cited technical interviews.
Select your role to see how concrete requirements turn into targeted, evidence-backed shortlists.
A client SOW or change request turns into a resource request to the resource-management group. Billable start date is fixed.
“The bench doesn't fit; the external hire is slow; the client is waiting.”
Skip keyword-matching resumes. We match candidates who have already shipped relevant code, passed cited technical reviews, and opted in to speaking with your team.
Client: Global Fintech · 6-month initial SOW · High-throughput transaction settlement engine.
Three candidates, each claim linked to its source: a merged PR or a cited interview moment.
Client: Global Fintech · 6-month initial SOW · High-throughput transaction settlement engine.
Skills to evidenceShare the documents that define how your team works. The interview adds questions that probe for them, and the report marks alignment with cited moments, the same way it marks technical depth.
Used only to build your team's interviews.
Probing for: Ownership
“Tell me about a spec that was ambiguous and you shipped anyway. What did you decide on your own, and what did you escalate?”from values.pdf · §2 Ownership
| Ownership | MET | cites 18:04 |
|---|---|---|
| Written communication | MET | cites 22:40 |
| Customer empathy | CANNOT TELL | not probed deeply enough |
“Cannot tell” is a valid answer. The report never guesses at culture fit.
Align requisitioners, engineering managers, recruiters, and panel interviewers around verified candidate evidence.
Defines the exact technical requirement, billable start date, and non-negotiable tech stack proficiencies.
| Capability | REQUESTER | APPROVER | COORDINATOR | PANEL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| View shortlist | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| View portfolios & graph | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| View live progress | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Leave feedback | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Approve hire | — | ✓ | — | — |
Roles and permissions are being designed now. Today the founder assigns them by hand during the co-pilot cohort.
Every candidate dossier is assembled from real engineering receipts, never self-reported buzzwords.
Code merged into mentor-led project repositories after review.
6 sources de-duplicated into one graph of skills and projects.
Real-time task completion, PR review cycles, and autonomy indicators.
Every score cites the transcript moment it came from.
Objective proof from incident response tables, architecture auctions, and fork duels.
A percentage of the first-year salary you offer (rate agreed on a call).
Zero platform fees, zero search charges. You only pay when a candidate signs and joins your team.
Post as many need briefs as your team requires. We scope each one with you on a short call.
We never take placement fees, cuts of salary, or upfront application fees from candidates. Ever.
The fee is raised only once the hire has started work with your team.
How we protect engineering candidates, company reputations, and the integrity of our verification signal.
Candidates explicitly choose which teams see their verified dossier. Consent can be revoked at any point from their dashboard.
All placement success fees are paid entirely by hiring employers. We strictly prohibit any fee splitting or deductions from candidate salaries.
Algorithms match verified code and evidence to requirements, but human hiring managers and engineering leads conduct final interviews and make all offers.
We are currently accepting a limited number of engineering teams into our private hiring pilot to ensure high-touch curation and quality.
Everything engineering leaders and recruitment teams need to know about our hiring pilot.
Instead of writing an expansive 3-page generic job description, you specify the operational need: the squad, the billable start date or timeline, the critical technologies, and the exact kind of problem they must solve on day one.
Most searches start from keyword-matched CVs. Intervues starts from evidence: merged PRs on mentor-led projects, cited interview moments, and a tiered skills graph. You review the receipts before the first call.
Every evidence card links to its source: code reviewed and merged by a mentor, or the cited moment in an interview transcript. It shows what someone actually did, not what their CV says.
The success fee is invoiced only after the candidate successfully starts work. If you don't hire anyone through our introductions, you owe zero.
Yes. Every shortlisted dossier includes the skills graph, PR links and cited transcript moments, so your panel can spend its time on the questions only your team can ask.