A mentor-led team ships it in your repo. The robots do the chores. Accountability is built into the workflow.
The system reads your plain-English concept and your actual repository structure (languages, dependencies, README) to propose structured epics and tasks.
“We need a distributed rate-limiter service with sliding-window counters, Redis cluster failover, and Prometheus metrics for our API gateway.”
The AI proposes the plan from your actual repository tree. The mentor approves and publishes once. After that, development proceeds task-by-task with strict criteria checks.
Mentors lead the architecture. Automations handle branch formatting, static checks, acceptance criteria evaluation, and status reporting.
task/42-sliding-window-limiter
Closes INT-42 via branch pattern match
Branch naming, commit format, CI checks pass
Static lint & security analysis before LLM pass
Acceptance criteria checked: met / not met / cannot tell
Explains mentor comments with technical reasoning
Auto-generates gap-closure topics & study resources
Mentor approves and merges directly via GitHub
Deterministically recalculates project health metrics
The AI does the first pass.The mentor stays the decision-maker.The metrics are computed in code, not generated.
Mentor-led engineering teams run with deterministic permissions. Nobody gets bogged down guessing who has merge authority or review responsibility.
Retains 100% intellectual property, full repo ownership, and the final say on product milestones.
| Capability | REPO OWNER | TECH LEAD | BOT REVIEWER | CONTRIBUTOR | CONTRIBUTOR | CONTRIBUTOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repo read | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Repo write | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Merge PR | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | — | — |
| Review PR | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Board edit | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | — |
| View progress | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Invite members | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — |
Roles and permissions are being designed now. Today the founder assigns them by hand during the co-pilot cohort.
“Access is earned. Help is available. Commitments are explicit. Contributions are observable. Seats are temporary. Evidence is permanent.”
Set an explicit weekly commitment object: working hours, target delivery date, and agreed communication rhythm.
Set project vision, repo connection, and decomposed epics.
Provide codebase context and approve starter tasks.
Review pull requests with AI criteria checks already completed.
Answer architectural forks; triage stalled tasks before they go red.
Award verified contributor endorsement on milestone completion.
Active branches moving, reviews completed within SLA, steady task progress.
Task dormant for >48h or review pending >24h. Friendly check-in dispatched.
Missed milestone without prior notice. Scope reduced or unblocker session scheduled.
Unresponsive past grace period. Seat reallocated to waitlist; previous verified work preserved.
Build your MVP with an accountable team in your own repository, guided directly by senior engineers and Intervues founder.
Important transparency note: In-platform collaborator budgets and escrow payouts are currently ROADMAP. During the co-pilot phase, milestone arrangements are handled directly and transparently with the founding team.
Apply for a founding slot in the co-piloted cohort. Pair with vetted mentors and accumulate permanent code receipts in your own repo.